800-270-8184
Oceanside Telemarketing Fraud Criminal Defense Lawyers
Oceanside California Telemarketing Fraud Charges
- 24 hour service
- Over 50 years of combined defense experience
- Affordable rates and payment plans
- Call us 800-270-8184 / email info@wiselaws.com
At Wise Laws, our Oceanside lawyers multiply an energetic defense for individuals and businesses charged with Oceanside CA telemarketing fraud. Wise Laws represent clients from around the country. If you have been accused of operating fraudulent schemes using telephones, it is important to have experienced legal representation.
You will find that our attorneys are experienced, creative and dedicated to resolving your legal problem. Oceanside CA Conviction of telemarketing fraud can carry major penalties. It is important to have a seasoned defense team when fighting Oceanside California telemarketing fraud charges.
Some Oceanside California Telemarketing Fraud Charges include:
-
Oceanside California Charity schemes
-
Oceanside Prize promotion giveaways
-
Oceanside Public official impersonation
-
Asking for advanced payment without sending goods
-
Selling names of people whom have been defrauded
-
Oceanside Magazine schemes
-
Oceanside Office equipment schemes
-
Oceanside California Lottery ticket schemes
-
Oceanside Tax payment schemes
-
Oceanside Vending machine fraud
-
Oceanside Loan schemes
-
Oceanside Jury service fraud schemes
In general, Oceanside California telemarketing schemes involve promising something of value over the telephone and the victim has made not delivering it after payment. Such charges can also involve obtaining credit card information by telephone and then making use of the victim’s credit. If you have been accused of operating a Oceanside CA telemarketing scheme along these lines, it is in your best interests to seek legal counsel right away.
If you are facing any telemarketing fraud charges in Oceanside, you can be assured that Wise Laws will help in defending you effectively, working to recognize weaknesses in the prosecution’s case that lead to reasonable doubt among members of the jury.
