800-270-8184
Waterbury Telemarketing Fraud Criminal Defense Lawyers
Waterbury Connecticut Telemarketing Fraud Charges
- 24 hour service
- Over 50 years of combined defense experience
- Affordable rates and payment plans
- Call us 800-270-8184 / email info@wiselaws.com
At Wise Laws, our Waterbury lawyers multiply an energetic defense for individuals and businesses charged with Waterbury CT telemarketing fraud. Wise Laws represent clients from around the country. If you have been accused of operating fraudulent schemes using telephones, it is important to have experienced legal representation.
You will find that our attorneys are experienced, creative and dedicated to resolving your legal problem. Waterbury CT Conviction of telemarketing fraud can carry major penalties. It is important to have a seasoned defense team when fighting Waterbury Connecticut telemarketing fraud charges.
Some Waterbury Connecticut Telemarketing Fraud Charges include:
-
Waterbury Connecticut Charity schemes
-
Waterbury Prize promotion giveaways
-
Waterbury Public official impersonation
-
Asking for advanced payment without sending goods
-
Selling names of people whom have been defrauded
-
Waterbury Magazine schemes
-
Waterbury Office equipment schemes
-
Waterbury Connecticut Lottery ticket schemes
-
Waterbury Tax payment schemes
-
Waterbury Vending machine fraud
-
Waterbury Loan schemes
-
Waterbury Jury service fraud schemes
In general, Waterbury Connecticut telemarketing schemes involve promising something of value over the telephone and the victim has made not delivering it after payment. Such charges can also involve obtaining credit card information by telephone and then making use of the victim’s credit. If you have been accused of operating a Waterbury CT telemarketing scheme along these lines, it is in your best interests to seek legal counsel right away.
If you are facing any telemarketing fraud charges in Waterbury, you can be assured that Wise Laws will help in defending you effectively, working to recognize weaknesses in the prosecution’s case that lead to reasonable doubt among members of the jury.
